This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hawley, P. H. Articles by Card, N. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females

University of Kansas, USA, phawley{at}ku.edu

Todd D. Little

University of Kansas, USA

Noel A. Card

University of Arizona, USA

Evolutionary and biological approaches tend to suggest that social dominance is predominately an aspect of male social organization. Furthermore, when females behave non-normatively, they are less positively evaluated than males engaging in the same behavior. Alternate, less familiar models of females and dominance/aggression underlie the present study which proposes that dominant males and females are more similar in both behavioral profile and social reception than commonly believed. Participants (N = 1723; grades 5—10) self-rated their aggression, social motivations, and strategies and beliefs associated with interpersonal influence. Peer ratings of strategies of influence, aggression, and the degree to which peers were liked and disliked were also obtained. Results demonstrated that socially dominant males and females balance prosocial and coercive strategies and win positive peer regard, their aggressiveness notwithstanding. These findings highlight competitiveness in females and provide insights into the paradoxical relationship between positive peer regard and aggression (the peer regard—aggression paradox).

Key Words: aggression • gender • peer relations • social dominance

References

• Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291—322.
• Bagwell, C.L., Coie, J.D., Terry, R.A., & Lochman, J.E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280—305.
• Bear, G.G. (1989). Sociomoral reasoning and antisocial behaviors among normal sixth graders. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 181—196.
• Bear, G.G., & Rys, G.S. (1994). Moral reasoning, classroom behavior, and sociometric status among elementary school children. Developmental Psychology, 30, 633—638.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Benenson, J.F. (1993). Greater preference among females than males for dyadic interaction in early childhood. Child Development, 64, 544—555.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bergman, L.R. (1998). A pattern-oriented approach to studying individual development: Snapshots and processes. In R.B. Cairns, L.R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 83—121). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Berndt, T.J. (1981). Age changes and changes over time in prosocial intentions and behavior between friends. Developmental Psychology, 17, 408—416.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Bettencourt, B.A., & Miller, N. (1996). Gender differences in aggression as a function of provocation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 422—447.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Biernat, M., & Thompson, E.R. (2002). Shifting standards and contextual variation in stereotyping. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 103—137). London: Wiley.
• Björkqvist, K., & Niemelä, P. (1992). New trends in the study of female aggression. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 3—16). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemelä (Eds.), Of mice and women: Aspects of female aggression (pp. 51—64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Bukowski, W.M. (2003). What does it mean to say aggressive children are competent or incompetent? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 390—400.
• Buss, D.M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 291—317.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Cairns, R.B., & Cairns, B.D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cairns, R., Xie, H., & Leung, M. (1998). The popularity of friendship and the neglect of social networks: Toward a new balance. In W.M. Bukowski & A.H. Cillessen (Eds.), Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group (pp. 25—54). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203—252.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chandler, M.J. (1973). Egocentrism and antisocial behavior: The assessment and training of social perspective-taking skills. Developmental Psychology, 9, 326—332.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147—163.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Clutton-Brock, T.M. (1983). Selection in relation to sex. In D.S. Bendall (Ed.), Evolution: From molecules to men (pp. 457—481). London: Cambridge University Press.
• Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261—282.
• Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 779—862). New York: Wiley.
• Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557—570.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Kuperschmidt, J. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S.R. Asher & J.D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17—59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Coie, J., Dodge, K., Terry, R., & Wright, V. (1991). The role of aggression in peer relations: An analysis of aggression episodes in boys' play groups. Child Development, 62, 812—826.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Crick, N.R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus non-normative forms of aggression: Links to social—psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610—617.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social—psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710—722.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Crick, N.R., Ostrov, J.M., Appleyard, K., Jansen, E.A., & Casas, J.F. (2004). Relational aggression in early childhood: "You can't come to my birthday party unless...". In M. Putallaz & K. Bierman (Eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 71—89). New York: Guilford Press.
• Crick, N.R., & Rose, A.J. (2000). Toward a gender-balanced approach to the study of social—emotional development: A look at relational aggression. In E. Kofsky Scholnick & P.H. Miller (Eds.), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 153—168). Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
• Cross, S.E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5—37.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1994). Evolutionary psychology of male violence. In J. Archer (Ed.), Male violence (pp. 253—288). New York: Routledge.
• Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.
• Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
• Dunbar, N.E., & Burgoon, J.K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207—233.[Abstract]
• Eagly, A.H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of aggression sex differences: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 223—224.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154—165.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Farmer, T.W., & Rodkin, P.C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 176—190.
• Führ, C. (1997). The German education system since 1945. Outlines and problems. Bonn: Inter Nations.
• Galen, G.R., & Underwood, M.K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33, 589—600.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Geary, D.C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Geary, D.C., Byrd-Craven, J., Hoard, M.K., Vigil, J., & Numtee, C. (2003). Evolution and development of boys' social behavior. Developmental Review, 23, 444—470.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hawley, P.H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97—132.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Hawley, P.H. (2002). Social dominance and prosocial and coercive strategies of resource control in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167—176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hawley, P.H. (2003a). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279—309.
• Hawley, P.H. (2003b). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 213—235.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Hawley, P.H. (2004, March). The myth of the alpha male: Gender differences (and similarities) in beliefs about social dominance and resource control. Symposium presentation at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Baltimore, MD.
• Hawley, P.H. (2006). Evolution and personality: A new look at Machiavellian-ism. In D. Mroczek & T. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 147—161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Hawley, P.H., Card, N.E., & Little, T.D. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 170—180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hawley, P.H., & Little, T.D. (1999). Winning some and losing some: A social relations approach to social dominance in toddlers. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 185—214.
• Hawley, P.H., Little, T.D., & Pasupathi, M. (2002). Winning friends and influencing peers: Strategies of peer influence in late childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 466—473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Hawley, P.H., Little, T.D., & Rodkin, P. (2007). Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Helgeson, V.S., & Fritz, H.L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031—1057.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Hermann, S., Imme, U., & Meinlschmidt, G. (1998). Sozialstrukturales Berlin — Eine disaggregierte statistische Sozialraumanalyse [Social structure of Berlin — Disaggregated statistical analyses of the social structure]. Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit und Soziales.
• Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1991). Personality and status. In D.G. Gilbert & J. Connolly (Eds.), Personality, social skills, and psychopathology: An individual differences approach. New York: Plenum Press.
• Hrdy, S.B. (1999). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Original published 1981).
• Hughes, C., White, A., Sharpen, J., & Dunn, J. (2000). Antisocial, angry, and unsympathetic: "Hard-to-manage" preschoolers' peer problems and possible cognitive influences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 169—179.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
• Keane, S.P., & Calkins, S.D. (2004). Predicting kindergarten peer social status from toddler and preschool problem behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 409—424.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Kracke, B., & Schmidt-Rodermund, E. (2001). Adolescents' career exploration in the context of educational and occupational transitions. In J.E. Nurmi (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence: European perspectives (pp. 141—165). New York: Routledge.
• LaFrance, M., & Henley, N.M. (1994). On oppressing hypotheses: Or differences in nonverbal sensitivity revisited. In H.L. Radtke & H.J. Stam (Eds.), Power/gender: Social relations in theory and practice (pp. 287—311). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Lease, M.A., Musgrove, K.T., & Axelrod, J.L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likeability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508—533.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Little, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53—76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Little, T.D., Brauner, J., Jones, S.M., Nock, M.K., & Hawley, P.H. (2003). Rethinking aggression: A typological examination of the functions of aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 343—369.
• Little, T.D., Card, N.A., Slegers, D.W., & Ledford, E.C. (in press). Modeling contextual effects with multiple-group MACS models. In T.D. Little, J.A. Bovaird, & N.A. Card (Eds.), Modeling ecological and contextual effects in longitudinal studies of human development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151—173.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Little, T.D., Slegers, D.W., & Card, N.A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 59—72.
• Little, T.D., & Wanner, B. (1997). The Multi-CAM: A multidimensional instrument to assess children's action-control motives, beliefs, and behaviors (Materialen aus der Bildungsforschung, No. 59, ISBN #3-87985-064-x). Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.
• Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression. New York: Bantam.
• Maccoby, E.E. (1988). Gender as a social category. Developmental Psychology, 24, 755—765.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Maccoby, E.E., & Jacklin, C.N. (1974). The psychology of gender differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Magnusson, D. (2003). The person approach: Concepts, measurement models, and research strategy. In S.C. Peck & R.W. Roeser (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development. Person-centered approaches to studying development in context (pp. 3—23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Marsh, H.W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275—300.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Maslow, A. (1940). Dominance-quality and social behavior in infra-human primates. Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 313—324.
• Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525—543.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Newcomb, A.F., Bukowski, W.M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99—128.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
• Ostrov, J.M., & Keating, C.F. (2004). Gender differences in preschool aggression during free play and structured interactions: An observational study. Social Development, 13, 255—277.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Ostrov, J.M., Woods, K.E., Jansen, E.A., Casas, J.F., & Crick, N.R. (2004). An observational study of delivered and received aggression, gender, and social—psychological adjustment in preschool: "This white crayon doesn't work...". Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 355—371.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Paquette, J.A., & Underwood, M.K. (1999). Young adolescents' experiences of peer victimization: Gender differences in accounts of social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 233—258.
• Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A.G. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125—144.[Abstract]
• Pellegrini, A.D. (2004). Sexual segregation in childhood: A review of evidence for two hypotheses. Animal Behaviour, 68, 435—443.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Pellegrini, A.D., & Archer, J. (2005). Sex differences in competitive and aggressive behavior: A view from sexual selection theory. In B.J. Ellis & D.F. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 219—244). New York: Guilford Press.
• Pellegrini, A.D., Roseth, C.J., Mliner, S., Bohn, C.M., Van Ryzin, M., Vance, N., Cheatham, C.L., & Tarullo, A. (in press). Social dominance in preschool classrooms. Journal of Comparative Psychology.
• Pellegrini, A.D., & Smith, P.K. (1998). Physical activity play: The nature and function of a neglected aspect of play. Child Development, 69, 577—598.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Phillipsen, L.C., Deptula, D.P., & Cohen, R. (1999). Relating characteristics of children and their friends to relational and overt aggression. Child Study Journal, 29, 269—289.
• Pope, A.W., Bierman, K.L., & Mumma, G.H. (1991). Aggression, hyperactivity, and inattention—immaturity: Behavior dimensions associated with peer rejection in elementary school boys. Developmental Psychology, 27, 663—671.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Stallworth, L.M. (1993). Sexual selection and the sexual and ethnic basis of social hierarchy. In L. Ellis (Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality: A comparative biosocial analysis (pp. 111—137). Westport, CT: Praeger.
• Rodkin, P.C., Farmer, T.W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14—24.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Rose, A.J., Swenson, L.P., & Waller, E.M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378—387.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Rudman, L.A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004—1010.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Rudman, L.A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743—762.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Sebanc, A.M., Pierce, S.L., Cheatham, C.L., & Gunnar, M.R. (2003). Gendered social worlds in preschool: Dominance, peer acceptance and assertive social skills in boys' and girls' peer groups. Social Development, 12, 91—106.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Sutton, J., Smith, P.K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Socially undesirable need not be incompetent: A response to Crick and Dodge. Social Development, 8, 132—134.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Taylor, S.E., Klein, L.C., Lewis, B.P., Gruenewald, T.L., Gurung, R.A.R., & Updegraff, J.A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107, 411—429.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Thorne, B. (1986). Girls and boys together but mostly apart: Gender arrangements in elementary schools. In W.W. Hartup & Z. Rubin (Eds.), Relationships and development (pp. 167—184). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Tremblay, R.E., Pihl, R.O., Vitaro, F., & Dobkin, P.L. (1994). Predicting early onset of male antisocial behavior from preschool behavior. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 732—739.[Abstract]
• Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871—1971 (pp. 136—179). Chicago: Aldine.
• Underwood, M.K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford Press.
• Underwood, M.K. (2004). Gender and peer relations: Are the two gender cultures really all that different? In J.B. Kupersmidt & K.A. Dodge (Eds.), Children's peer relations: From development to intervention (pp. 21—36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Underwood, M.K., Galen, B.R., & Paquette, J.A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248—266.[CrossRef][ISI]
• Whiting, B.B., & Edwards, C.P. (1988). Children of different worlds:The formation of social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wrangham, R., & Peterson, D. (1996). Demonic males: Apes and the origins of human violence. New York: Houghton.
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Geiger, T.C., & Crick, N.R. (2005). Relational and physical aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and bidirectional associations. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 421—452.[Abstract]

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hawley, P. H. Articles by Card, N. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?