Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Behavioral Development
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labrell, F.
Right arrow Articles by Juhel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Fathers’ and mothers’ distancing strategies towards toddlers

F. Labrell

M. Deleau

J. Juhel

University of Rennes 2, France

Fathers’ and mothers’ distancing strategies towards preschoolers were studied in 30-month-old (N = 13) and 42-month-old (N = 15) parent-children dyads, using Sigel’s scheme. This coding scheme concerns either direct verbal requests (or denominations), or indirect demands about presented objects. Afree play situation included objects that allowed several activities, functional or not (doll, little cars, etc). The aim was twofold. First, distancing was linked to the child’s age and to the sex of parent with the assumption that fathers would be more challenging. Second, children’s symbolic activity was linked to parental distancing strategies at each age. Results showed that there was a significant effect of children’s age on the distancing measures as well as on children’s symbolic activity. The hypothesis of a more challenging father was not supported. The child’s symbolic activity was better predicted by mother’s distancing than by father’s. Such results indicate a need to consider more complex relationships between paternal interaction and children’s outcomes and to take into account extra-familial contributions.

International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 24, No. 3, 356-361 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/01650250050118349


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early Childhood ResearchHome page
X.-l. Wang, R. Bernas, and P. Eberhard
Maternal teaching strategies in four cultural communities: Implications for early childhood teachers
Journal of Early Childhood Research, October 1, 2005; 3(3): 269 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
C. Bourdais
Distancing Theory: Looking at Early Ontogeny through Sigel's Perspective
Culture Psychology, June 1, 2002; 8(2): 215 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]