Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Behavioral Development
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crystal, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Preference for diversity in competitive and cooperative contexts: A study of American and Japanese children and adolescents

David S. Crystal

Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA

Hirozumi Watanabe

Ehime University, Japan

Ru San Chen

Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA

This study examined preferences and explanations for wanting to be in a same-versus mixedachievement classroom, and in a group of peers with similar versus dissimilar interests and hobbies on a school trip among 5th, 8th, and 11th graders in Detroit and Matsuyama, Japan. Choice of the diverse environment varied by context, location, and grade level. Across contexts, preference for diversity tended to decrease among Detroit students, and increase among Matsuyama students with age. Additionally, students in Detroit were more likely than their peers in Matsuyama to give abilitybased and activity-related explanations; students in Matsuyama were more likely than students in Detroit to give mastery-based and cognitive-related explanations. Results are discussed in terms of social comparison theory.

International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 24, No. 3, 348-355 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/01650250050118330


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?