This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by von Eye, A. Articles by Schuster, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The road to freedom: Quantitative developmental methodology in the third millennium

Michigan State University, USA

Christof Schuster

University of Notre Dame, IN, USA

In this article we ask three questions. First, what is the relationship between substantive psychological research and research in the area of applied quantitative, statistical methods? Second, what is the development that applied quantitative methodology will undergo in the foreseeable future? Third, will this development affect the future of psychological research? The answers to these questions are cast in terms of six trends and three anticipated problems. The trends are: (1) increase in the number of available statistical methods; (2) substantive thinking triggers the development of new statistical methods; (3) statistical methods become increasingly flexible; (4) computers do the thinking; (5) there will be new paradigms such as the person-oriented perspective; and (6) statistical methods will be custom-tailored to substantive questions. The general tenor of the discussion of these trends is that the number of possibilities will increase and the researcher will be freed from method-specific constraints. The three problem trends are: (1) the choice between methods of analysis becomes increasingly difficult; (2) cases of misuse of statistics will become more frequent; and (3) the role of the methodologist will change such that more substantive knowledge will be required. In addition, issues of training of methodologists and financing research are discussed. The general outlook is depicted as encouraging.

International Journal of Behavioral Development, Vol. 24, No. 1, 35-43 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/016502500383458


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Von Eye and C. Schuster Preface to the Jar Special Issue: Methodology for Research on Adolescence--the Need for Innovation Journal of Adolescent Research, January 1, 2001; 16(1): 4 - 8. [PDF]